Pima vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Immigrants from Laos
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Immigrants from Laos
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Laos Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,481,341 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.386. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 14.7 Immigrants from Laos.
Pima vs Immigrants from Laos Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $90,909, a difference of 23.9%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $78,327, a difference of 23.8%), and per capita income ($30,644 compared to $37,857, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $50,041, a difference of 2.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $85,553, a difference of 3.3%), and median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $36,841, a difference of 4.3%).
Income Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Laos |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Tragic $37,857 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Tragic $92,239 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Tragic $78,327 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Tragic $42,884 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Tragic $49,190 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Tragic $36,841 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Tragic $50,041 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Tragic $85,553 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Tragic $90,909 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Tragic $56,722 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Exceptional 23.8% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 100.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 99.7%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 80.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.0%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 26.3%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 32.2%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Laos |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 10.2% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 15.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 20.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 19.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 18.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Tragic 18.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 18.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 22.9% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 30.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 13.8% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 148.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 131.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 112.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Laos |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Excellent 17.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Fair 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Average 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Fair 5.5% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 12.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Laos |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 40.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 81.6% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 51.4%), single father households (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 46.0%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.96%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Laos |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 45.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 34.0% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 73.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 6.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Laos |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Exceptional 91.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Exceptional 59.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 22.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 48.8%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 36.2%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.80%), 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Laos |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Tragic 95.7% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Tragic 94.5% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Tragic 94.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Tragic 93.2% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Tragic 91.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 90.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 88.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 86.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Tragic 82.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Tragic 61.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 54.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 31.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 47.8%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 41.6%), and ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.0%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.0%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Laos |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 26.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 49.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.7% |