Brazilian vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

COMPARE

Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Laos
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Brazilians

Immigrants from Laos

Good
Fair
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Laos Integration in Brazilian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,380,591 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.008. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Immigrants from Laos.
Brazilian Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Laos Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,700 compared to $37,857, a difference of 23.4%), median family income ($106,942 compared to $92,239, a difference of 15.9%), and median male earnings ($56,837 compared to $49,190, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $56,722, a difference of 8.4%), householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $50,041, a difference of 8.6%), and median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $36,841, a difference of 9.9%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Laos Income
Income MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Laos
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,700
Tragic
$37,857
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,942
Tragic
$92,239
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,934
Tragic
$78,327
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,356
Tragic
$42,884
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,837
Tragic
$49,190
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,483
Tragic
$36,841
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,335
Tragic
$50,041
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,267
Tragic
$85,553
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,408
Tragic
$90,909
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,465
Tragic
$56,722
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
23.8%

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 24.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 22.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.5%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.3%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
Poverty MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Laos
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Tragic
13.8%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Tragic
15.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Tragic
20.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Tragic
19.4%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Tragic
18.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.8%
Tragic
18.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Tragic
22.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Tragic
13.8%

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.48%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Laos
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Good
5.2%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Excellent
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.5%

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Laos
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.6%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Exceptional
40.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.3%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
81.6%

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.3%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.2%), married-couple households (46.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Laos
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
65.3%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Tragic
45.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.2%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Tragic
34.0%

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 43.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 28.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 27.1%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Laos
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Exceptional
91.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.8%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
22.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
7.7%

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 53.8%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 52.7%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
Education Level MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Laos
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Tragic
93.2%
10th Grade
Good
93.8%
Tragic
91.9%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
90.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
86.6%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Tragic
82.7%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Tragic
61.3%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.5%
Tragic
54.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.7%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Tragic
31.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.4%

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Laos Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 23.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 16.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 5.9%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
Disability MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Laos
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
26.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%