Cuban vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cuban
Immigrants from Laos
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cubans
Immigrants from Laos
3,662
SOCIAL INDEX
34.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
213th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Laos Integration in Cuban Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,623,582 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.538. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 3.1 Immigrants from Laos.
Cuban vs Immigrants from Laos Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $56,722, a difference of 15.4%), median family income ($84,981 compared to $92,239, a difference of 8.5%), and median household income ($73,392 compared to $78,327, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $50,041, a difference of 1.2%), per capita income ($37,383 compared to $37,857, a difference of 1.3%), and wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Income Metric | Cuban | Immigrants from Laos |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,383 | Tragic $37,857 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,981 | Tragic $92,239 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,392 | Tragic $78,327 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,619 | Tragic $42,884 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,580 | Tragic $49,190 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,942 | Tragic $36,841 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,655 | Tragic $50,041 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $81,483 | Tragic $85,553 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,301 | Tragic $90,909 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,152 | Tragic $56,722 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.3% | Exceptional 23.8% |
Cuban vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 50.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 45.4%), and receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (13.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.44%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Poverty Metric | Cuban | Immigrants from Laos |
Poverty | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Families | Tragic 10.6% | Tragic 10.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 15.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.2% | Tragic 20.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.1% | Tragic 19.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 18.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 18.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 18.9% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Tragic 22.9% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.6% | Tragic 30.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 16.1% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 18.0% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Cuban vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Cuban | Immigrants from Laos |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 5.4% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.6% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Excellent 17.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.9% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Fair 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.0% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.0% | Average 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Poor 9.2% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Fair 5.5% |
Cuban vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 27.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cuban | Immigrants from Laos |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.2% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.8% | Exceptional 40.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.5% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.5% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 81.6% |
Cuban vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 17.1%), births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 15.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.4% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.52%), currently married (44.6% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.86%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Cuban | Immigrants from Laos |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.7% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Poor 27.1% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.4% | Tragic 45.1% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.6% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 39.4% | Tragic 34.0% |
Cuban vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 29.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 16.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.32%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 5.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cuban | Immigrants from Laos |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.5% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.5% | Exceptional 91.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.3% | Exceptional 59.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 22.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Cuban vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 25.2%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 22.2%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (88.9% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (94.1% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and 9th grade (93.2% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.020%).
Education Level Metric | Cuban | Immigrants from Laos |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 96.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 96.9% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 96.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 96.7% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Tragic 96.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Tragic 95.7% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.6% | Tragic 94.5% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Tragic 94.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Tragic 93.2% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.5% | Tragic 91.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Tragic 90.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.9% | Tragic 88.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.4% | Tragic 86.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.0% | Tragic 82.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 58.6% | Tragic 61.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.4% | Tragic 54.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.9% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.5% | Tragic 31.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.4% |
Cuban vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 29.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.55%), ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Disability Metric | Cuban | Immigrants from Laos |
Disability | Average 11.7% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.3% | Tragic 26.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Tragic 49.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.5% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.7% |