Immigrants from Bahamas vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,786,798 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Bahamas communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.208. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bahamas within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.078% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bahamas corresponds to a decrease of 78.3 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 13.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,910 compared to $85,553, a difference of 11.2%), and median household income ($71,349 compared to $78,327, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($37,193 compared to $37,857, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($35,027 compared to $36,841, a difference of 5.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,174 compared to $56,722, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 20.7%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 20.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 1.7%), single female poverty (22.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 25.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (40.1% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 18.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.7%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.1%), family households (63.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 46.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 28.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 41.0%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.7%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (61.1% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 10.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.6%).