Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

COMPARE

Guatemalan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Laos
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Guatemalans

Immigrants from Laos

Poor
Fair
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Laos Integration in Guatemalan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,308,187 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 13.5 Immigrants from Laos.
Guatemalan Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities

Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 5.3%), median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $49,190, a difference of 5.2%), and median family income ($88,295 compared to $92,239, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($37,766 compared to $37,857, a difference of 0.24%), householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $50,041, a difference of 3.0%), and median household income ($75,961 compared to $78,327, a difference of 3.1%).
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Income
Income MetricGuatemalanImmigrants from Laos
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,766
Tragic
$37,857
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,295
Tragic
$92,239
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,961
Tragic
$78,327
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,205
Tragic
$42,884
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,736
Tragic
$49,190
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,695
Tragic
$36,841
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,525
Tragic
$50,041
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,331
Tragic
$85,553
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,705
Tragic
$90,909
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,526
Tragic
$56,722
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.6%
Exceptional
23.8%

Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 23.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.24%), single female poverty (23.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and receiving food stamps (14.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 4.7%).
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
Poverty MetricGuatemalanImmigrants from Laos
Poverty
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
15.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
20.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
19.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
18.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
18.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Males
Tragic
13.8%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
23.8%
Tragic
22.9%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.9%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.5%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
13.8%

Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.80%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.9%).
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
Unemployment MetricGuatemalanImmigrants from Laos
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.6%
Excellent
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.5%

Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.65%).
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricGuatemalanImmigrants from Laos
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
40.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.2%
Tragic
81.6%

Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 9.2%), currently married (42.9% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and married-couple households (43.3% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.020%), family households (65.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
Family Structure MetricGuatemalanImmigrants from Laos
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Exceptional
65.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.9%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.3%
Tragic
45.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.40
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.9%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.1%
Tragic
34.0%

Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.8%).
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricGuatemalanImmigrants from Laos
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
91.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Exceptional
22.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.7%

Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 9.9%), college, under 1 year (56.8% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.32%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.34%).
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
Education Level MetricGuatemalanImmigrants from Laos
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
89.9%
Tragic
93.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
87.9%
Tragic
91.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
86.4%
Tragic
90.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
86.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
78.5%
Tragic
82.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.8%
Tragic
61.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.2%
Tragic
54.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.5%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
31.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.4%

Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.8%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 13.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.23%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
Disability MetricGuatemalanImmigrants from Laos
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.5%
Tragic
26.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.7%