Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Immigrants from Laos
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Guatemalans
Immigrants from Laos
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Laos Integration in Guatemalan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,308,187 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 13.5 Immigrants from Laos.
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 5.3%), median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $49,190, a difference of 5.2%), and median family income ($88,295 compared to $92,239, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($37,766 compared to $37,857, a difference of 0.24%), householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $50,041, a difference of 3.0%), and median household income ($75,961 compared to $78,327, a difference of 3.1%).
Income Metric | Guatemalan | Immigrants from Laos |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,766 | Tragic $37,857 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,295 | Tragic $92,239 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,961 | Tragic $78,327 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,205 | Tragic $42,884 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,736 | Tragic $49,190 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,695 | Tragic $36,841 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,525 | Tragic $50,041 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,331 | Tragic $85,553 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,705 | Tragic $90,909 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,526 | Tragic $56,722 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.6% | Exceptional 23.8% |
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 23.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.24%), single female poverty (23.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and receiving food stamps (14.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 4.7%).
Poverty Metric | Guatemalan | Immigrants from Laos |
Poverty | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 10.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 15.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 20.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 19.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 18.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Tragic 18.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.4% | Tragic 18.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.8% | Tragic 22.9% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 30.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.5% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.8% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.80%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Guatemalan | Immigrants from Laos |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Poor 5.4% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.6% | Excellent 17.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.1% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Fair 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Average 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Fair 5.5% |
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.65%).
Labor Participation Metric | Guatemalan | Immigrants from Laos |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.5% | Exceptional 40.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.2% | Tragic 81.6% |
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 9.2%), currently married (42.9% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and married-couple households (43.3% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.020%), family households (65.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Guatemalan | Immigrants from Laos |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.9% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.3% | Tragic 45.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.40 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.9% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.1% | Tragic 34.0% |
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Guatemalan | Immigrants from Laos |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Exceptional 91.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 59.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Exceptional 22.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 9.9%), college, under 1 year (56.8% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.32%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.34%).
Education Level Metric | Guatemalan | Immigrants from Laos |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.6% | Tragic 96.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.5% | Tragic 96.9% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Tragic 96.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Tragic 96.7% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 96.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Tragic 95.7% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Tragic 94.5% |
8th Grade | Tragic 91.1% | Tragic 94.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 89.9% | Tragic 93.2% |
10th Grade | Tragic 87.9% | Tragic 91.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 86.4% | Tragic 90.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 88.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.0% | Tragic 86.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 78.5% | Tragic 82.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.8% | Tragic 61.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 54.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.5% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.0% | Tragic 31.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.4% |
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.8%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 13.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.23%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Disability Metric | Guatemalan | Immigrants from Laos |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.5% | Tragic 26.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Tragic 49.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |