Immigrants from Egypt vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,280,262 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Egypt communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Egypt within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Egypt corresponds to a decrease of 5.5 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,361 compared to $37,857, a difference of 25.1%), median male earnings ($59,925 compared to $49,190, a difference of 21.8%), and median family income ($111,689 compared to $92,239, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,239 compared to $50,041, a difference of 8.4%), wage/income gap (26.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,299 compared to $56,722, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 33.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 27.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and single father poverty (14.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 38.1%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.5%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 49.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 56.5%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 53.3%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.0%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 32.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.1%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 6.4%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.0%).