Russian vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,139,527 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.568. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 41.1 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,154 compared to $37,857, a difference of 40.4%), median family income ($120,487 compared to $92,239, a difference of 30.6%), and median male earnings ($63,939 compared to $49,190, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $50,041, a difference of 8.7%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 17.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,626 compared to $56,722, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 42.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 38.2%), and family poverty (7.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.7%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 45.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 42.6%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.0%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.34, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 42.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 95.2%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 88.7%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 85.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 27.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 23.5%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.16%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.6%).