Immigrants from Ireland vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,156,728 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Ireland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ireland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.083% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ireland corresponds to an increase of 82.7 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($56,584 compared to $37,857, a difference of 49.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($120,333 compared to $85,553, a difference of 40.6%), and median family income ($127,584 compared to $92,239, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 12.9%), householder income under 25 years ($57,075 compared to $50,041, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,495 compared to $56,722, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 50.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 47.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.51%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 55.1%), single mother households (5.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 53.1%), and births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.4%), married-couple households (48.0% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.34, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 67.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 42.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 6.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 94.2%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 84.5%), and master's degree (20.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 79.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 36.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 28.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.3%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.4%).