Immigrants from Moldova vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,985,618 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 38.7 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,489 compared to $37,857, a difference of 25.4%), median male earnings ($59,417 compared to $49,190, a difference of 20.8%), and median family income ($109,975 compared to $92,239, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 10.0%), householder income over 65 years ($62,939 compared to $56,722, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($56,168 compared to $50,041, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (13.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 35.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 35.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.28%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.98%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.96%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 35.7%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 34.0%), and births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.4%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 29.2%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 57.3%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 50.2%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 22.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 3.7%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.6%).