Immigrants from Barbados vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,886,295 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Barbados communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.238. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Barbados within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.052% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Barbados corresponds to a decrease of 52.2 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (17.8% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 33.5%), median female earnings ($41,685 compared to $36,841, a difference of 13.2%), and per capita income ($41,478 compared to $37,857, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($92,419 compared to $92,239, a difference of 0.20%), median household income ($78,989 compared to $78,327, a difference of 0.85%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,394 compared to $90,909, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 38.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 33.4%), and receiving food stamps (16.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 40.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 36.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.0% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 40.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.7% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 32.0%), married-couple households (39.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.44%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (63.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 260.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 113.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 90.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 30.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 65.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 90.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.6%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 20.2%), and no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (89.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.13%), 11th grade (90.7% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and high school diploma (86.4% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 34.7%), disability age under 5 (0.97% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 29.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.63%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 2.7%).