Arapaho vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,718,083 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.476% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 475.9 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $90,909, a difference of 19.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $85,553, a difference of 19.3%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $49,190, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $56,722, a difference of 4.7%), and median family income ($82,064 compared to $92,239, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 68.7%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 59.3%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 148.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 134.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 133.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 38.6%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 19.7%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (66.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 18.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.97%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 49.6%), bachelor's degree (26.6% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 18.7%), and doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (82.8% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.030%), college, 1 year or more (54.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.99%), and college, under 1 year (60.3% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.3%).