Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,894,359 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.715. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.045% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 45.1 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($72,193 compared to $92,239, a difference of 27.8%), median household income ($61,663 compared to $78,327, a difference of 27.0%), and per capita income ($30,256 compared to $37,857, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 7.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $50,041, a difference of 10.6%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $36,841, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 100.0%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 97.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 88.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 40.8%), single father poverty (22.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 46.2%), and single female poverty (34.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 49.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 98.8%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 86.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 83.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 29.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 15.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 46.6%), single father households (3.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 33.7%), and currently married (36.8% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.8%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.53 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 91.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 18.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 8.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 36.2%), bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 29.5%), and associate's degree (31.8% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (94.5% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.40%), 9th grade (92.6% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and 7th grade (95.0% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 74.2%), ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 39.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.83%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.9%).