Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ghanaian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Laos
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ghanaians

Immigrants from Laos

Fair
Fair
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Laos Integration in Ghanaian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,489,135 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.191% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to an increase of 191.2 Immigrants from Laos.
Ghanaian Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Laos Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,164 compared to $37,857, a difference of 11.4%), median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $36,841, a difference of 9.7%), and median earnings ($46,440 compared to $42,884, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,594 compared to $50,041, a difference of 5.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $85,553, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,043 compared to $56,722, a difference of 5.9%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Laos Income
Income MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Laos
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,164
Tragic
$37,857
Median Family Income
Poor
$98,877
Tragic
$92,239
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,582
Tragic
$78,327
Median Earnings
Average
$46,440
Tragic
$42,884
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,810
Tragic
$49,190
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,429
Tragic
$36,841
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,594
Tragic
$50,041
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$90,137
Tragic
$85,553
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,277
Tragic
$90,909
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$60,043
Tragic
$56,722
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.3%
Exceptional
23.8%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 16.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.33%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.58%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
Poverty MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Laos
Poverty
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
13.8%
Families
Tragic
10.3%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
15.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
20.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
19.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
18.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
18.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Tragic
22.9%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.7%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.4%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.4%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
13.8%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 18.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
Unemployment MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Laos
Unemployment
Tragic
6.0%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
6.1%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Excellent
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.2%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Fair
5.5%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Laos
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.3%
Exceptional
40.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
81.6%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.2%), married-couple households (42.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and currently married (42.9% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 0.74%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother households (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.4%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
Family Structure MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Laos
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
65.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.2%
Tragic
45.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.9%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.3%
Tragic
34.0%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 101.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 46.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 9.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 23.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 36.8%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Laos
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
91.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
48.0%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
22.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
7.7%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 36.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 33.3%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.61%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.62%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
Education Level MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Laos
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
93.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.8%
Tragic
91.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Tragic
90.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.7%
Tragic
86.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
82.7%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
63.9%
Tragic
61.3%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.4%
Tragic
54.7%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.0%
Tragic
31.6%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.4%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Laos Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 24.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.27%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 3.5%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
Disability MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Laos
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.1%
Tragic
26.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.5%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.7%