Immigrants from Austria vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,683,977 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Austria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.606. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Austria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.321% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Austria corresponds to an increase of 321.2 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,503 compared to $37,857, a difference of 38.7%), median family income ($116,830 compared to $92,239, a difference of 26.7%), and median male earnings ($62,164 compared to $49,190, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,400 compared to $50,041, a difference of 4.7%), median female earnings ($42,824 compared to $36,841, a difference of 16.2%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 45.2%), family poverty (7.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 33.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 46.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 40.5%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.5%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.5%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 87.7%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 85.6%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 77.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 24.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 23.0%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 3.0%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and male disability (11.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.0%).