Uruguayan vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,277,022 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.054% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 54.4 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,318 compared to $37,857, a difference of 17.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,631 compared to $85,553, a difference of 9.4%), and median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $49,190, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $56,722, a difference of 4.2%), householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $50,041, a difference of 4.8%), and wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (16.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 16.6%), receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 16.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.1% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 5.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.4%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.6%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.18%), married-couple households (45.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.84%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 25.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 42.7%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 40.7%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.2% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.93%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 26.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 17.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 6.4%).