Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

COMPARE

Scotch-Irish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Laos
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Scotch-Irish

Immigrants from Laos

Average
Fair
5,433
SOCIAL INDEX
51.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
176th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Laos Integration in Scotch-Irish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,479,210 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Scotch-Irish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scotch-Irish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.160% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scotch-Irish corresponds to an increase of 160.3 Immigrants from Laos.
Scotch-Irish Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities

Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Laos Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 19.5%), per capita income ($42,563 compared to $37,857, a difference of 12.4%), and median male earnings ($53,658 compared to $49,190, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,383 compared to $36,841, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($49,039 compared to $50,041, a difference of 2.0%), and median household income ($80,972 compared to $78,327, a difference of 3.4%).
Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Laos Income
Income MetricScotch-IrishImmigrants from Laos
Per Capita Income
Fair
$42,563
Tragic
$37,857
Median Family Income
Poor
$99,591
Tragic
$92,239
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,972
Tragic
$78,327
Median Earnings
Poor
$44,924
Tragic
$42,884
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,658
Tragic
$49,190
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,383
Tragic
$36,841
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,039
Tragic
$50,041
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,969
Tragic
$85,553
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,073
Tragic
$90,909
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,447
Tragic
$56,722
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.5%
Exceptional
23.8%

Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 30.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.0%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (22.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 0.070%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and single mother poverty (31.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 3.0%).
Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
Poverty MetricScotch-IrishImmigrants from Laos
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Good
13.3%
Tragic
15.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
20.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
19.4%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.3%
Tragic
18.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Tragic
18.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.7%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Males
Tragic
14.7%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
22.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.5%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.8%

Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.4%).
Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
Unemployment MetricScotch-IrishImmigrants from Laos
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.6%
Excellent
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.7%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Fair
5.5%

Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.45%).
Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricScotch-IrishImmigrants from Laos
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.3%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.5%
Exceptional
40.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.0%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
81.6%

Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.7%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 24.2%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.5%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
Family Structure MetricScotch-IrishImmigrants from Laos
Family Households
Average
64.4%
Exceptional
65.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.3%
Tragic
45.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.7%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Tragic
34.0%

Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.94%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 3.0%).
Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricScotch-IrishImmigrants from Laos
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
91.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.9%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Exceptional
22.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.7%

Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 117.0%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 36.3%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
Education Level MetricScotch-IrishImmigrants from Laos
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
93.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Tragic
91.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
90.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Tragic
86.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.8%
Tragic
82.7%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.4%
Tragic
61.3%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.9%
Tragic
54.7%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.3%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.4%
Tragic
31.6%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.4%

Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Laos Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 36.2%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 20.5%), and male disability (13.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
Disability MetricScotch-IrishImmigrants from Laos
Disability
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
26.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.3%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.1%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.7%