Immigrants from Korea vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 185,199,574 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Korea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.328. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Korea within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Korea corresponds to a decrease of 6.7 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,671 compared to $37,857, a difference of 36.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,243 compared to $90,909, a difference of 33.4%), and median family income ($122,800 compared to $92,239, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,716 compared to $50,041, a difference of 11.3%), wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 16.7%), and median female earnings ($44,847 compared to $36,841, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 58.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 46.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.57%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.5%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 20.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 44.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.1%), and births to unmarried women (26.3% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 17.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 90.9%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 87.8%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 73.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 44.7%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 7.5%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.4%).