Croatian vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

COMPARE

Croatian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Laos
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Croatians

Immigrants from Laos

Excellent
Fair
8,930
SOCIAL INDEX
86.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
37th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Laos Integration in Croatian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,059,805 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Croatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.399. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Croatians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.031% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Croatians corresponds to a decrease of 31.2 Immigrants from Laos.
Croatian Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities

Croatian vs Immigrants from Laos Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Croatian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,742 compared to $37,857, a difference of 26.1%), wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 21.7%), and median male earnings ($59,715 compared to $49,190, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,662 compared to $50,041, a difference of 3.2%), median female earnings ($40,993 compared to $36,841, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,225 compared to $56,722, a difference of 11.5%).
Croatian vs Immigrants from Laos Income
Income MetricCroatianImmigrants from Laos
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,742
Tragic
$37,857
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,370
Tragic
$92,239
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,685
Tragic
$78,327
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,724
Tragic
$42,884
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,715
Tragic
$49,190
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,993
Tragic
$36,841
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,662
Tragic
$50,041
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,414
Tragic
$85,553
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,383
Tragic
$90,909
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,225
Tragic
$56,722
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
23.8%

Croatian vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Croatian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 44.5%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 43.6%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.5%), single mother poverty (28.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 8.9%).
Croatian vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
Poverty MetricCroatianImmigrants from Laos
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
20.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
19.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
18.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Tragic
18.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Males
Average
12.8%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
22.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
13.8%

Croatian vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Croatian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.6%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
Croatian vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCroatianImmigrants from Laos
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Excellent
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.4%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.6%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.5%

Croatian vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Croatian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Croatian vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCroatianImmigrants from Laos
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.1%
Exceptional
40.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.2%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
81.6%

Croatian vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Croatian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 40.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 34.7%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.5%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 7.5%).
Croatian vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCroatianImmigrants from Laos
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
65.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
45.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.2%
Tragic
34.0%

Croatian vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Croatian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.030%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 0.99%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Croatian vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCroatianImmigrants from Laos
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Exceptional
91.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.6%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
22.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.7%

Croatian vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Croatian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 115.7%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 51.5%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Croatian vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
Education Level MetricCroatianImmigrants from Laos
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
93.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
91.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Tragic
90.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Tragic
86.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.8%
Tragic
82.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Tragic
61.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Tragic
54.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.6%
Tragic
31.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.4%

Croatian vs Immigrants from Laos Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Croatian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 22.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 19.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.34%), male disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
Croatian vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
Disability MetricCroatianImmigrants from Laos
Disability
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Fair
12.4%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.8%
Tragic
26.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%