Turkish vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,080,647 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.731. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 33.4 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $37,857, a difference of 38.4%), median family income ($121,202 compared to $92,239, a difference of 31.4%), and median male earnings ($64,253 compared to $49,190, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $50,041, a difference of 8.4%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $56,722, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 45.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 39.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.6%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.7%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 39.9%), and births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.6%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.4%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 42.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 32.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 93.8%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 91.3%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 76.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 34.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 24.2%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.0%).