Immigrants from Ghana vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,800,309 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.389. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.130% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to an increase of 130.1 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,131 compared to $37,857, a difference of 8.6%), median female earnings ($39,894 compared to $36,841, a difference of 8.3%), and wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,333 compared to $50,041, a difference of 2.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,760 compared to $85,553, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,624 compared to $56,722, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 20.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (18.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.37%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.4%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and currently married (42.7% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.4%), births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 103.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 48.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 10.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 24.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 38.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 28.1%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.55%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 23.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.98%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.0%).