Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,702,870 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.733. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.300% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 300.3 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $37,857, a difference of 46.8%), median family income ($122,765 compared to $92,239, a difference of 33.1%), and median male earnings ($65,406 compared to $49,190, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $50,041, a difference of 7.1%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 17.8%), and median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $36,841, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 48.4%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 32.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.46%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.79%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.5%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 42.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 37.7%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 4.5%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 24.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 108.1%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 106.5%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 80.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 30.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 24.5%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 5.4%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 9.0%).