Celtic vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

COMPARE

Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Laos
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Celtics

Immigrants from Laos

Average
Fair
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Laos Integration in Celtic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,079,624 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.679. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.994% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 994.2 Immigrants from Laos.
Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities

Celtic vs Immigrants from Laos Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,621 compared to $37,857, a difference of 15.2%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 14.4%), and median male earnings ($54,242 compared to $49,190, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $50,041, a difference of 0.81%), median female earnings ($38,283 compared to $36,841, a difference of 3.9%), and median household income ($83,193 compared to $78,327, a difference of 6.2%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Laos Income
Income MetricCelticImmigrants from Laos
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,621
Tragic
$37,857
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,139
Tragic
$92,239
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,193
Tragic
$78,327
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,732
Tragic
$42,884
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,242
Tragic
$49,190
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,283
Tragic
$36,841
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,447
Tragic
$50,041
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,241
Tragic
$85,553
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,896
Tragic
$90,909
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,608
Tragic
$56,722
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
23.8%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 26.0%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 22.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (22.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 1.0%), single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 4.3%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
Poverty MetricCelticImmigrants from Laos
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Families
Good
8.8%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Average
13.4%
Tragic
15.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
20.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
19.4%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Tragic
18.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Tragic
18.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
22.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
13.8%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCelticImmigrants from Laos
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Excellent
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.7%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Fair
5.5%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.82%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCelticImmigrants from Laos
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.3%
Exceptional
40.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
81.6%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 24.9%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.8%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 2.1%), family households (63.8% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.6%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCelticImmigrants from Laos
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
65.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
45.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Tragic
34.0%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCelticImmigrants from Laos
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
91.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
22.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.7%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 92.9%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 37.0%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
Education Level MetricCelticImmigrants from Laos
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Tragic
93.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
91.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Tragic
90.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Tragic
86.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.7%
Tragic
82.7%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Tragic
61.3%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
54.7%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Tragic
31.6%
Master's Degree
Average
14.8%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.4%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Laos Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 33.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.0%), and male disability (13.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.97%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (13.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.5%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
Disability MetricCelticImmigrants from Laos
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Tragic
26.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.2%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.7%