Arab vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,390,961 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Arab communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.440. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arabs corresponds to a decrease of 4.3 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,662 compared to $37,857, a difference of 20.6%), median male earnings ($57,298 compared to $49,190, a difference of 16.5%), and median family income ($106,952 compared to $92,239, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,219 compared to $50,041, a difference of 2.4%), householder income over 65 years ($62,266 compared to $56,722, a difference of 9.8%), and median female earnings ($40,718 compared to $36,841, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 19.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.27%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 34.2%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.3%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 28.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 55.5%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 52.2%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 18.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 4.5%).