Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,358,635 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from the Azores communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.128. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from the Azores within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.118% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from the Azores corresponds to an increase of 117.7 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 14.1%), householder income over 65 years ($52,121 compared to $56,722, a difference of 8.8%), and median male earnings ($53,503 compared to $49,190, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($80,357 compared to $78,327, a difference of 2.6%), median family income ($95,402 compared to $92,239, a difference of 3.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,138 compared to $90,909, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 27.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 23.8%), and receiving food stamps (16.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.71%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 26.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 16.4%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.1% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.080%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and family households (65.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (27.3% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 15.7%), professional degree (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and associate's degree (35.6% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (97.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 78.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 18.1%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.51%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.90%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.6%).