Immigrants from Lithuania vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,603,228 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.458. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to a decrease of 19.7 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,361 compared to $35,999, a difference of 42.7%), median family income ($118,053 compared to $84,835, a difference of 39.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,336 compared to $82,287, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $45,450, a difference of 21.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $53,060, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 66.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 62.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 62.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 14.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.4%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 35.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 43.9%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 34.1%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 38.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 24.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 72.7%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 67.6%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 71.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 71.2%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 15.5%), disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 17.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 33.4%).