Arapaho vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,327,218 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.440. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.141% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 141.1 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 19.9%), median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $47,729, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $53,060, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($67,965 compared to $69,947, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $45,450, a difference of 3.3%), and median family income ($82,064 compared to $84,835, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 29.2%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 15.7%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (20.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 105.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 99.5%), and male unemployment (11.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 96.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 27.7%), currently married (40.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 14.1%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.21, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.97%), family households (66.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 23.9%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.2%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.26%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 47.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 45.9%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.9%).