Laotian vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,672,473 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.836. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.576% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 576.3 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($94,990 compared to $69,947, a difference of 35.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $82,287, a difference of 35.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $78,168, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 6.7%), householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $45,450, a difference of 19.6%), and median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $47,729, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 59.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 49.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 49.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 29.5%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 26.1%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.4%), family households (65.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 62.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 59.6%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 65.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 62.3%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 10.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 25.6%).