Pennsylvania German vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,523,378 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to an increase of 5.3 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,852 compared to $45,450, a difference of 11.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,956 compared to $82,287, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,836 compared to $78,168, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,888 compared to $53,060, a difference of 0.32%), median female earnings ($34,802 compared to $33,775, a difference of 3.0%), and per capita income ($37,842 compared to $35,999, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 31.9%), male poverty (11.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 28.7%), and poverty (12.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (20.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and single male poverty (15.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.8%), unemployment (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 22.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.2%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 17.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.62%), family households (66.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 39.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.2%), college, under 1 year (54.5% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and professional degree (3.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (82.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 48.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 27.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 11.2%).