Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,900,668 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.056. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($106,057 compared to $69,947, a difference of 51.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($124,188 compared to $82,287, a difference of 50.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($116,626 compared to $78,168, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 4.2%), householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $45,450, a difference of 27.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $53,060, a difference of 32.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 77.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.7% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 68.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 10.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 37.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 48.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 31.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 49.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 38.1%), and divorced or separated (10.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.42%), family households (66.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (30.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 27.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 19.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.84%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (20.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 87.8%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 82.7%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 81.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.1% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.10%), 7th grade (96.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 85.2%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 84.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 82.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 12.7%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 37.9%).