Slavic vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,435,226 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.580. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.142% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 142.5 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,049 compared to $35,999, a difference of 25.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,629 compared to $82,287, a difference of 24.7%), and median family income ($105,144 compared to $84,835, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $45,450, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $53,060, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 43.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 11.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.5%), and single father poverty (17.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 26.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 20.7%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.0%), and births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.8%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 40.9%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 40.5%), and bachelor's degree (38.9% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.14%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 51.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 40.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 10.6%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.6%).