Mexican vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,763,726 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Mexican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.579. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexicans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexicans corresponds to a decrease of 1.7 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,989 compared to $45,450, a difference of 10.0%), wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and median household income ($74,399 compared to $69,947, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,664 compared to $33,775, a difference of 0.33%), median family income ($85,618 compared to $84,835, a difference of 0.92%), and median earnings ($39,834 compared to $40,270, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 28.4%), single male poverty (14.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 21.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (20.9% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 1.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and family poverty (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.5%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.2% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 15.8%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.1%), and family households with children (31.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 0.12%), currently married (45.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (47.1% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.7%), no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.86%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.7% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 81.8%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and professional degree (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 46.6%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 42.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.1% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 3.0%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 11.1%).