Houma vs Choctaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Houma
Choctaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Houma
Choctaw
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Choctaw Integration in Houma Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,301,716 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.061. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 27.5 Choctaw.
Houma vs Choctaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 37.4%), householder income over 65 years ($44,822 compared to $53,060, a difference of 18.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $82,287, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,044 compared to $78,168, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $45,450, a difference of 2.5%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $40,270, a difference of 3.4%).
Income Metric | Houma | Choctaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,996 | Tragic $35,999 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,188 | Tragic $84,835 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $62,575 | Tragic $69,947 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,949 | Tragic $40,270 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,547 | Tragic $47,729 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $30,343 | Tragic $33,775 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,356 | Tragic $45,450 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,044 | Tragic $78,168 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $72,093 | Tragic $82,287 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,822 | Tragic $53,060 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 38.7% | Tragic 28.1% |
Houma vs Choctaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 38.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 3.4%).
Poverty Metric | Houma | Choctaw |
Poverty | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Tragic 20.0% | Tragic 16.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 26.2% | Tragic 24.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 18.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 23.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 24.9% | Tragic 21.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.2% | Tragic 21.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 21.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.5% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 33.8% | Tragic 27.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 20.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.5% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.7% | Poor 11.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.2% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 13.6% |
Houma vs Choctaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 47.7%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 3.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Houma | Choctaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.7% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 6.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 19.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Houma vs Choctaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Houma | Choctaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 59.5% | Tragic 61.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 72.7% | Tragic 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.2% | Tragic 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.9% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.5% | Tragic 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 74.1% | Tragic 78.2% |
Houma vs Choctaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 26.2%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.6%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Houma | Choctaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.5% | Fair 46.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 14.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 46.6% | Tragic 36.9% |
Houma vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 58.7%), no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 45.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 43.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Houma | Choctaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.6% | Exceptional 92.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Exceptional 59.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Houma vs Choctaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 53.7%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 50.9%), and professional degree (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.97%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Houma | Choctaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 96.2% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Excellent 95.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.0% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 89.8% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 87.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 75.0% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 47.6% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 41.2% | Tragic 52.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 37.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 21.4% | Tragic 29.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 11.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 0.96% | Tragic 1.4% |
Houma vs Choctaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 31.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and male disability (17.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 0.32%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 4.4%).
Disability Metric | Houma | Choctaw |
Disability | Tragic 17.1% | Tragic 15.4% |
Males | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 15.4% |
Females | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 16.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.3% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 52.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 8.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 3.0% |