Hispanic or Latino vs Choctaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hispanic or Latino
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hispanics or Latinos

Choctaw

Tragic
Fair
991
SOCIAL INDEX
7.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
328th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Choctaw Integration in Hispanic or Latino Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,681,019 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.503. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hispanics or Latinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hispanics or Latinos corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Choctaw.
Hispanic or Latino Integration in Choctaw Communities

Hispanic or Latino vs Choctaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 13.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,279 compared to $45,450, a difference of 10.6%), and median household income ($73,823 compared to $69,947, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,288 compared to $40,270, a difference of 0.040%), householder income over 65 years ($52,832 compared to $53,060, a difference of 0.43%), and per capita income ($35,688 compared to $35,999, a difference of 0.87%).
Hispanic or Latino vs Choctaw Income
Income MetricHispanic or LatinoChoctaw
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,688
Tragic
$35,999
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,647
Tragic
$84,835
Median Household Income
Tragic
$73,823
Tragic
$69,947
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,288
Tragic
$40,270
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,419
Tragic
$47,729
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,421
Tragic
$33,775
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,279
Tragic
$45,450
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,515
Tragic
$78,168
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,006
Tragic
$82,287
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,832
Tragic
$53,060
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
24.9%
Tragic
28.1%

Hispanic or Latino vs Choctaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 25.9%), and single father poverty (16.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (21.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 0.93%), female poverty (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Hispanic or Latino vs Choctaw Poverty
Poverty MetricHispanic or LatinoChoctaw
Poverty
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
11.6%
Males
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Females
Tragic
16.6%
Tragic
16.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.5%
Tragic
24.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
21.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
21.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
21.1%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Females
Tragic
24.6%
Tragic
27.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
20.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.3%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.3%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
13.6%

Hispanic or Latino vs Choctaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Hispanic or Latino vs Choctaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHispanic or LatinoChoctaw
Unemployment
Tragic
5.9%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
6.2%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
19.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.9%

Hispanic or Latino vs Choctaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.4% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.2% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Hispanic or Latino vs Choctaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHispanic or LatinoChoctaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Tragic
61.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.6%
Tragic
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.4%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.2%
Tragic
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.1%
Tragic
78.2%

Hispanic or Latino vs Choctaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 13.3%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.3%), and family households with children (29.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.2%), births to unmarried women (37.8% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.9%).
Hispanic or Latino vs Choctaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHispanic or LatinoChoctaw
Family Households
Exceptional
67.4%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.9%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.4%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.41
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.1%
Fair
46.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
14.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.8%
Tragic
36.9%

Hispanic or Latino vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Hispanic or Latino vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHispanic or LatinoChoctaw
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
92.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.9%
Exceptional
59.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.8%

Hispanic or Latino vs Choctaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 67.5%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and high school diploma (82.9% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (37.7% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 0.15%), bachelor's degree (29.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and master's degree (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.92%).
Hispanic or Latino vs Choctaw Education Level
Education Level MetricHispanic or LatinoChoctaw
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
92.7%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Excellent
95.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
88.9%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.3%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.4%
Tragic
89.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
79.1%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.0%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.1%
Tragic
52.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.7%
Tragic
37.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.6%
Tragic
29.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.9%
Tragic
11.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.4%

Hispanic or Latino vs Choctaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 46.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 43.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 12.5%).
Hispanic or Latino vs Choctaw Disability
Disability MetricHispanic or LatinoChoctaw
Disability
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
15.4%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
15.4%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
15.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
16.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.6%
Tragic
52.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
8.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
3.0%