Jordanian vs Choctaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Jordanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Jordanians

Choctaw

Exceptional
Fair
9,589
SOCIAL INDEX
93.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
11th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Choctaw Integration in Jordanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,363,587 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.318. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to a decrease of 12.8 Choctaw.
Jordanian Integration in Choctaw Communities

Jordanian vs Choctaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,376 compared to $82,287, a difference of 32.9%), median household income ($91,794 compared to $69,947, a difference of 31.2%), and median family income ($109,865 compared to $84,835, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 5.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $45,450, a difference of 14.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,313 compared to $53,060, a difference of 21.2%).
Jordanian vs Choctaw Income
Income MetricJordanianChoctaw
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,605
Tragic
$35,999
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$109,865
Tragic
$84,835
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,794
Tragic
$69,947
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,632
Tragic
$40,270
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$58,500
Tragic
$47,729
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,464
Tragic
$33,775
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,796
Tragic
$45,450
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,186
Tragic
$78,168
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$109,376
Tragic
$82,287
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,313
Tragic
$53,060
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
28.1%

Jordanian vs Choctaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 50.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 49.6%), and single female poverty (18.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.7%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 28.7%).
Jordanian vs Choctaw Poverty
Poverty MetricJordanianChoctaw
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
11.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
16.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Tragic
24.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
18.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
21.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
21.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
21.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
27.2%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Tragic
20.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.6%

Jordanian vs Choctaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 33.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.3%).
Jordanian vs Choctaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricJordanianChoctaw
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
19.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
9.0%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%

Jordanian vs Choctaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Jordanian vs Choctaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricJordanianChoctaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Tragic
61.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.4%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
78.2%

Jordanian vs Choctaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 29.3%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.89%), family households (65.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.2%).
Jordanian vs Choctaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricJordanianChoctaw
Family Households
Exceptional
65.5%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.0%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.0%
Fair
46.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
14.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
36.9%

Jordanian vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.90%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.1%).
Jordanian vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricJordanianChoctaw
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
92.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.6%
Exceptional
59.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.8%

Jordanian vs Choctaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 49.7%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 46.8%), and bachelor's degree (41.2% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.1% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 7th grade (96.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and 9th grade (95.3% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.21%).
Jordanian vs Choctaw Education Level
Education Level MetricJordanianChoctaw
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
2.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Excellent
95.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
89.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.2%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.2%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.0%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Tragic
52.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.2%
Tragic
37.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Tragic
29.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
11.0%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.4%

Jordanian vs Choctaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 66.7%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 64.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 9.9%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 32.0%).
Jordanian vs Choctaw Disability
Disability MetricJordanianChoctaw
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
15.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
15.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
16.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
52.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
3.0%