Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Choctaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Trinidadians and Tobagonians

Choctaw

Poor
Fair
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
298th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Choctaw Integration in Trinidadian and Tobagonian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,019,461 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.682. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to an increase of 44.8 Choctaw.
Trinidadian and Tobagonian Integration in Choctaw Communities

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Choctaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 45.6%), median female earnings ($40,958 compared to $33,775, a difference of 21.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,631 compared to $45,450, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,327 compared to $53,060, a difference of 4.3%), median male earnings ($51,446 compared to $47,729, a difference of 7.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,357 compared to $82,287, a difference of 11.0%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Choctaw Income
Income MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianChoctaw
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,655
Tragic
$35,999
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,466
Tragic
$84,835
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,402
Tragic
$69,947
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,820
Tragic
$40,270
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,446
Tragic
$47,729
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,958
Tragic
$33,775
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,631
Tragic
$45,450
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,856
Tragic
$78,168
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,357
Tragic
$82,287
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,327
Tragic
$53,060
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
28.1%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Choctaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 30.5%), single female poverty (21.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 28.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.99%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and female poverty (15.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.9%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Choctaw Poverty
Poverty MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianChoctaw
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Tragic
11.6%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
16.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Tragic
24.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
18.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
21.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
21.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
21.1%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Tragic
27.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
20.7%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.2%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.9%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.0%
Tragic
13.6%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Choctaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.8%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Choctaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianChoctaw
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.6%
Tragic
19.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Poor
9.1%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.9%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Choctaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 22.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 4.4%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Choctaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianChoctaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Tragic
61.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.5%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
78.2%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Choctaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 24.8%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (63.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.21, a difference of 3.3%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Choctaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianChoctaw
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.9%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.5%
Fair
46.3%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Tragic
14.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.5%
Tragic
36.9%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 201.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 83.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 68.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 20.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 45.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 68.9%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianChoctaw
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.3%
Exceptional
92.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.9%
Exceptional
59.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.3%
Exceptional
7.8%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Choctaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 43.3%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 30.2%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.11%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and 11th grade (91.1% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.80%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Choctaw Education Level
Education Level MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianChoctaw
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Excellent
95.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Tragic
89.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.9%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Tragic
52.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
37.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.7%
Tragic
29.4%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Tragic
11.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.4%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Choctaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 82.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 67.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 10.4%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.2%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Choctaw Disability
Disability MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianChoctaw
Disability
Average
11.7%
Tragic
15.4%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
15.4%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
15.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.4%
Tragic
16.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
23.9%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Tragic
52.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
8.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
3.0%