New Zealander vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,616,419 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.985% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 985.2 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $35,999, a difference of 40.5%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $69,947, a difference of 36.0%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $84,835, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $45,450, a difference of 17.3%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $33,775, a difference of 25.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 43.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 36.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 29.8%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.9%), currently married (47.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 29.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 84.5%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 73.2%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 65.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 57.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 56.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 27.9%).