Celtic vs Choctaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Celtic
Choctaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Celtics
Choctaw
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Choctaw Integration in Celtic Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,772,802 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.006. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to a decrease of 5.0 Choctaw.
Celtic vs Choctaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,621 compared to $35,999, a difference of 21.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,896 compared to $82,287, a difference of 20.2%), and median family income ($101,139 compared to $84,835, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $45,450, a difference of 11.0%), and median female earnings ($38,283 compared to $33,775, a difference of 13.4%).
Income Metric | Celtic | Choctaw |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,621 | Tragic $35,999 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,139 | Tragic $84,835 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,193 | Tragic $69,947 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,732 | Tragic $40,270 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,242 | Tragic $47,729 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,283 | Tragic $33,775 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,447 | Tragic $45,450 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,241 | Tragic $78,168 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,896 | Tragic $82,287 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,608 | Tragic $53,060 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Tragic 28.1% |
Celtic vs Choctaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 31.7%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 31.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 12.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 12.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.7%).
Poverty Metric | Celtic | Choctaw |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 11.6% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Tragic 16.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 24.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 18.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 17.9% | Tragic 23.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.4% | Tragic 21.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Tragic 21.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 17.0% | Tragic 21.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 27.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 20.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.9% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Poor 11.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 13.6% |
Celtic vs Choctaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Celtic | Choctaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 19.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.7% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.5% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Celtic vs Choctaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 3.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Celtic | Choctaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.8% | Tragic 61.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.3% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.8% | Tragic 78.2% |
Celtic vs Choctaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.6%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.21, a difference of 3.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Celtic | Choctaw |
Family Households | Tragic 63.8% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.3% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.8% | Fair 46.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 14.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Tragic 36.9% |
Celtic vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.16%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Celtic | Choctaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.1% | Exceptional 92.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.2% | Exceptional 59.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Celtic vs Choctaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 36.0%), master's degree (14.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 33.8%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%).
Education Level Metric | Celtic | Choctaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Excellent 95.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.7% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 89.8% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.6% | Tragic 87.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.7% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.9% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 52.3% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Tragic 37.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Tragic 29.4% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.8% | Tragic 11.0% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.4% |
Celtic vs Choctaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 36.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 27.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 11.5%).
Disability Metric | Celtic | Choctaw |
Disability | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 15.4% |
Females | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 16.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.2% | Tragic 52.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Good 17.1% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 8.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.0% |