Burmese vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 246,753,057 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.208. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 2.1 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $82,287, a difference of 47.6%), median household income ($103,145 compared to $69,947, a difference of 47.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $78,168, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.45%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $45,450, a difference of 20.6%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $33,775, a difference of 33.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 77.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.0% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 64.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 64.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 51.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 39.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 33.5%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.060%), family households (65.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 90.3%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 82.3%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 78.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.1% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 78.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 78.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 66.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 10.6%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 14.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 33.9%).