Immigrants from Uganda vs Choctaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Uganda
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Uganda

Choctaw

Good
Fair
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Choctaw Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,789,164 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 38.5 Choctaw.
Immigrants from Uganda Integration in Choctaw Communities

Immigrants from Uganda vs Choctaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,584 compared to $82,287, a difference of 25.9%), median family income ($106,188 compared to $84,835, a difference of 25.2%), and median household income ($87,553 compared to $69,947, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 12.9%), householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $45,450, a difference of 15.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $53,060, a difference of 16.8%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Choctaw Income
Income MetricImmigrants from UgandaChoctaw
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,043
Tragic
$35,999
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,188
Tragic
$84,835
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,553
Tragic
$69,947
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,041
Tragic
$40,270
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,064
Tragic
$47,729
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,739
Tragic
$33,775
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,374
Tragic
$45,450
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,698
Tragic
$78,168
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,584
Tragic
$82,287
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,976
Tragic
$53,060
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
24.9%
Tragic
28.1%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Choctaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 34.7%), single female poverty (20.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 33.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 14.4%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Choctaw Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from UgandaChoctaw
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Average
9.1%
Tragic
11.6%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
16.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
24.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
18.1%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.7%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
21.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Tragic
21.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
21.1%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Females
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
27.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
20.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Average
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.9%
Tragic
13.6%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Choctaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 32.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Choctaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from UgandaChoctaw
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Average
5.3%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
19.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.9%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Choctaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.7%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Choctaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from UgandaChoctaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
61.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Tragic
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.2%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.0%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.0%
Tragic
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
78.2%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Choctaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 20.9%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 20.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.17%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.61%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Choctaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from UgandaChoctaw
Family Households
Tragic
62.7%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Good
3.23
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Fair
46.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Tragic
36.9%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 31.6%), no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 25.1%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from UgandaChoctaw
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.0%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
92.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
55.0%
Exceptional
59.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
7.8%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Choctaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 56.2%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 53.1%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.17%), 9th grade (94.8% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.40%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Choctaw Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from UgandaChoctaw
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Average
94.8%
Excellent
95.1%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Tragic
89.8%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.7%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.5%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.9%
Tragic
52.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
37.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.7%
Tragic
29.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
11.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.4%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Choctaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 62.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 58.9%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 20.1%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Choctaw Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from UgandaChoctaw
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
15.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
15.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.2%
Tragic
16.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.8%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.8%
Tragic
52.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
8.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
3.0%