Alaska Native vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,703,984 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.134% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to an increase of 134.4 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $45,450, a difference of 18.8%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $53,060, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,711 compared to $47,729, a difference of 4.2%), median earnings ($43,750 compared to $40,270, a difference of 8.6%), and per capita income ($39,558 compared to $35,999, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (16.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 26.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 22.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 66.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (7.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 60.1%), and male unemployment (8.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.6% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 29.0%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and family households with children (29.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.32%), married-couple households (45.6% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 120.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 6.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.9%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 0.24%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and 5th grade (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 57.1%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 34.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (52.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 0.22%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.4%).