Immigrants vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,991,019 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.633. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to a decrease of 3.3 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($85,818 compared to $69,947, a difference of 22.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,943 compared to $82,287, a difference of 21.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,423 compared to $78,168, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 12.0%), householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $53,060, a difference of 12.4%), and median male earnings ($54,168 compared to $47,729, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 34.2%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 30.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.4%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 25.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.74%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 20.0%), births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 12.9%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.81%), currently married (45.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (66.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 47.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 53.9%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 35.1%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (82.6% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.68%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 60.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 58.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.1%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 20.1%).