Austrian vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 235,723,844 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Austrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.722. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Austrians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.121% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Austrians corresponds to an increase of 1,120.8 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Austrian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,116 compared to $35,999, a difference of 33.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,692 compared to $82,287, a difference of 32.1%), and median family income ($111,306 compared to $84,835, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.96%), householder income under 25 years ($51,898 compared to $45,450, a difference of 14.2%), and median female earnings ($40,923 compared to $33,775, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Austrian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 48.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 45.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 18.0%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Austrian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 27.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Austrian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Austrian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.4%), and births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.63%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.1%), no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Austrian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 59.8%), master's degree (16.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 51.6%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.15%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 54.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 47.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 11.3%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 20.6%).