Immigrants from Caribbean vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,834,126 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.102. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 38.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $45,450, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($48,535 compared to $53,060, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,513 compared to $82,287, a difference of 0.28%), median family income ($83,319 compared to $84,835, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($41,119 compared to $40,270, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 45.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 45.2%), and receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (16.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.33%), poverty (15.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.7%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 21.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 18.9%), married-couple households (40.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and currently married (41.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.69%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.21, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 148.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 75.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 14.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 34.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 57.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 60.4%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 75.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 61.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.1%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 8.9%).