Ecuadorian vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,621,941 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 2.2 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 22.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $45,450, a difference of 18.6%), and median household income ($82,070 compared to $69,947, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $53,060, a difference of 3.6%), median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $47,729, a difference of 8.1%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $84,835, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 35.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 26.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.4%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.9%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.95%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 21.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 20.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.13%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.97%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 188.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 74.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 63.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 18.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 41.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 63.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 63.0%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 26.9%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.040%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 0.91%), and nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 81.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 71.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 54.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.0%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 11.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 18.4%).