Comanche vs Choctaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Comanche
Choctaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Comanche
Choctaw
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Choctaw Integration in Comanche Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,649,066 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.007. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 2.2 Choctaw.
Comanche vs Choctaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 12.4%), per capita income ($38,088 compared to $35,999, a difference of 5.8%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $33,775, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $47,729, a difference of 0.99%), median earnings ($41,519 compared to $40,270, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $53,060, a difference of 3.5%).
Income Metric | Comanche | Choctaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,088 | Tragic $35,999 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,556 | Tragic $84,835 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,747 | Tragic $69,947 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,519 | Tragic $40,270 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,202 | Tragic $47,729 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,661 | Tragic $33,775 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,518 | Tragic $45,450 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,152 | Tragic $78,168 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $85,787 | Tragic $82,287 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,922 | Tragic $53,060 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 28.1% |
Comanche vs Choctaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 12.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.4%), receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
Poverty Metric | Comanche | Choctaw |
Poverty | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 16.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 24.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 18.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 23.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 21.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Tragic 21.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 21.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.0% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.6% | Tragic 27.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 20.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.9% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Poor 11.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 13.6% |
Comanche vs Choctaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 31.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.29%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Comanche | Choctaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Comanche vs Choctaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Comanche | Choctaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Tragic 61.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.0% | Tragic 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.7% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.2% | Tragic 78.2% |
Comanche vs Choctaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.1%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.17%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Comanche | Choctaw |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.5% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Fair 46.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 36.9% |
Comanche vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 30.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 9.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Comanche | Choctaw |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.9% | Exceptional 92.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.5% | Exceptional 59.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Comanche vs Choctaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 13.7%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (87.9% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.060%), 11th grade (91.7% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.9% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.13%).
Education Level Metric | Comanche | Choctaw |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.8% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Exceptional 96.2% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Excellent 95.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.9% | Tragic 89.8% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Tragic 87.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.4% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.4% | Tragic 52.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.9% | Tragic 37.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.9% | Tragic 29.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.4% |
Comanche vs Choctaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 50.7%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 16.0%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 0.99%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 5.3%).
Disability Metric | Comanche | Choctaw |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 15.4% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 15.4% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 16.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.3% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.7% | Tragic 52.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 8.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.0% |