Norwegian vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 263,151,047 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.428. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 13.4 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $82,287, a difference of 26.0%), median family income ($106,144 compared to $84,835, a difference of 25.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,866 compared to $78,168, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.9%), median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $33,775, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $53,060, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 69.4%), family poverty (6.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 68.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 62.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 17.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 22.9%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 35.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 33.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 21.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.9%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 25.7%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.08 compared to 3.21, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 1.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.4%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 29.8%), and bachelor's degree (37.5% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.47%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 61.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 43.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 11.7%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 15.7%).