Tsimshian vs Choctaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGuatemalaGuyanaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tsimshian

Choctaw

Average
Fair
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Choctaw Integration in Tsimshian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,074,300 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to a decrease of 7.2 Choctaw.
Tsimshian Integration in Choctaw Communities

Tsimshian vs Choctaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $78,168, a difference of 25.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $45,450, a difference of 20.2%), and median family income ($101,543 compared to $84,835, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $47,729, a difference of 2.3%), median earnings ($43,695 compared to $40,270, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $53,060, a difference of 9.7%).
Tsimshian vs Choctaw Income
Income MetricTsimshianChoctaw
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,344
Tragic
$35,999
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,543
Tragic
$84,835
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,346
Tragic
$69,947
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,695
Tragic
$40,270
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,836
Tragic
$47,729
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,530
Tragic
$33,775
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,649
Tragic
$45,450
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,809
Tragic
$78,168
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,783
Tragic
$82,287
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,202
Tragic
$53,060
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.9%
Tragic
28.1%

Tsimshian vs Choctaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 84.3%), single father poverty (12.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 63.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and male poverty (12.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 12.4%).
Tsimshian vs Choctaw Poverty
Poverty MetricTsimshianChoctaw
Poverty
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Good
8.8%
Tragic
11.6%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Females
Good
13.1%
Tragic
16.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
24.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
18.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
21.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Tragic
21.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
21.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
27.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
20.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.8%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
13.6%

Tsimshian vs Choctaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 114.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 69.3%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.5%).
Tsimshian vs Choctaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTsimshianChoctaw
Unemployment
Tragic
7.2%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Tragic
19.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Tragic
5.9%

Tsimshian vs Choctaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.94%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Tsimshian vs Choctaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTsimshianChoctaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Tragic
61.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Tragic
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.4%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
88.7%
Tragic
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.4%
Tragic
78.2%

Tsimshian vs Choctaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.2%), births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (47.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (67.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.4%).
Tsimshian vs Choctaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTsimshianChoctaw
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.7%
Fair
46.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
14.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.2%
Tragic
36.9%

Tsimshian vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.91%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.9%).
Tsimshian vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTsimshianChoctaw
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
92.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Exceptional
59.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.8%

Tsimshian vs Choctaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in college, 1 year or more (57.9% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 10.7%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and college, under 1 year (64.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (98.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.61%).
Tsimshian vs Choctaw Education Level
Education Level MetricTsimshianChoctaw
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Excellent
95.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Tragic
89.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.3%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.9%
Tragic
52.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
37.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Tragic
29.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.4%

Tsimshian vs Choctaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (15.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 3.0%).
Tsimshian vs Choctaw Disability
Disability MetricTsimshianChoctaw
Disability
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
15.4%
Males
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
15.4%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
15.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
16.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.9%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
59.2%
Tragic
52.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.8%
Tragic
8.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.0%