Immigrants from Armenia vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,385,393 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from Armenia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.313. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Armenia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Armenia corresponds to a decrease of 6.1 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 35.8%), per capita income ($44,552 compared to $35,999, a difference of 23.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,867 compared to $78,168, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,974 compared to $53,060, a difference of 1.7%), median male earnings ($51,793 compared to $47,729, a difference of 8.5%), and median earnings ($46,094 compared to $40,270, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (18.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 45.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 43.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 4.6%), female poverty (15.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and poverty (13.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 35.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 32.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 30.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.1% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 41.5%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 36.6%), and divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.1%), married-couple households (44.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.21, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 34.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 23.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 84.6%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 40.4%), and bachelor's degree (39.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.76% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 147.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 79.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 70.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (54.3% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 8.0%).