Maltese vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,664,367 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Maltese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.916. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Maltese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.591% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Maltese corresponds to an increase of 591.4 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Maltese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,064 compared to $78,168, a difference of 40.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,754 compared to $82,287, a difference of 39.5%), and median household income ($97,015 compared to $69,947, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,735 compared to $45,450, a difference of 18.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,027 compared to $53,060, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Maltese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 63.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.2% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 61.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 21.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 24.8%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 35.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Maltese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 41.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Maltese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Maltese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 35.8%), births to unmarried women (27.8% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 32.5%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.24%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.2%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Maltese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 56.5%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 56.0%), and bachelor's degree (41.9% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 63.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 54.6%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 13.5%), disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 14.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.9%).