Immigrants from Belgium vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,310,704 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from Belgium communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belgium within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belgium corresponds to an increase of 55.3 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,082 compared to $35,999, a difference of 53.0%), median family income ($123,831 compared to $84,835, a difference of 46.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,932 compared to $82,287, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($54,830 compared to $45,450, a difference of 20.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,703 compared to $53,060, a difference of 31.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 54.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 48.8%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 41.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 27.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 36.7%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 32.1%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.9%), family households (63.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 49.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 25.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 115.3%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 99.9%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 88.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 67.1%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 64.4%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 10.7%), disability age over 75 (45.3% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 16.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 31.2%).